REIBER,
C.J. Petitioner appeals the civil division’s determination that it lacked
jurisdiction to consider his appeal of the probate division’s dismissal of his
petition to remove the individual family co-trustee on two trusts of which he
is a beneficiary and to name his wife as successor trustee. We uphold the civil
division’s reasoning but transfer petitioner’s appeal to this Court and remand
the matter for further proceedings in the probate division on the petition for
removal of trustee
The
probate division denied the petition, stating that, “[u]pon review of the
Petitioner’s moving papers and the reply of Trustee, the court will decline to
intervene in the administration of this trust.” In support of that statement,
the probate division cited 14A V.S.A. § 201(a), which provides that the probate
division “may intervene in the administration of a trust to the extent its
jurisdiction is invoked by an interested person or as provided by law.”
Petitioner
filed a timely notice of appeal to the civil division, which determined that it
lacked jurisdiction to consider the appeal because it raised only issues of law
that should have been appealed to this
Court. We agree with the civil
division’s assessment that petitioner’s appeal from the probate division’s
August 23 order essentially concerned questions of law. Nevertheless, rather than dismissing the
appeal, we will consider it as having been filed with this Court rather than
the civil division.
Turning
to the merits of the appeal, we conclude that the matter must be remanded .
Petitioner’s
appeal from the probate division’s August 23, 2018 order is transferred to this
Court. The August 23 order is reversed, and the matter is remanded for the
probate division to provide petitioner an opportunity to contest the dismissal
of his petition for removal and replacement of the individual family
co-trustee.
No comments:
Post a Comment